GenAIM runs your DD workflow end to end. Your team refines and approves. The partners sign off on a defensible report.
Your firm's checklists, risk frameworks, and red flag templates configured into a governed system. Every contract reviewed. Every issue rated. Every finding traceable. Built for work where speed matters, but defensibility matters more.
Different lawyers, different standards. Quality depends entirely on who's assigned.
No single system governs the process. Work scattered across tools, emails, and spreadsheets.
Institutional expertise walks out the door when the senior leaves. No encoded checklists, no retained methodology.
Reconstructing who reviewed what, when, and how is a manual exercise in liability management.
GenAIM doesn't replace your DD process. It operates it. Your firm's methodology, encoded once. Applied consistently across every matter. Reviewed by your team at gates you control.
Ansarada data room sync or upload. Documents indexed, classified by type, and matched to the right checklist automatically.
Seniors allocate documents to review. Scope what's in, what's out, and who signs off on each category.
Agents do first-pass against the checklist. Clauses identified, issues explained, risk rated. Document families mapped across the data room.
Dual-pane viewer: contract on one side, analysis on the other. Lawyers refine findings, edit risk ratings, and approve.
Actions and exceptions. Open items assigned, escalations tracked, every edit versioned.
Partner sign-off. Red flag report generated in your firm's Word template, populated with every finding, recommendation, and action.
Most AI tools stop at findings. GenAIM runs the full action and approval workflow: actions captured at the moment of review in the Dual Viewer with the clause still in front of you, tracked to closure, gated through approval, generated into a partner-ready red flag report.
The buyer should negotiate with the vendor before acquisition to obtain written consent to the change of control or an amendment removing Harbour from the change of control termination provisions in Clause 12.2(a)(vi).
Clause 12.2(a)(vi) treats a change of control of Harbour Pty Ltd as an event of default, allowing the vendor to immediately terminate the agreement under Clause 12.2(b) and (c). The buyer's acquisition of Harbour will trigger this termination right, meaning the vendor can end the contract upon completion of the sale.
Actions are created in the Dual Viewer at the moment of review, when the clause is still in front of the lawyer. No copy-paste into a separate spreadsheet, no off-platform tracking.
Triage controls senior lawyers actually use. Status, priority, overdue. Daily digest emails at start and end of day. Smart unread state shows what's new on return.
Actions must resolve before a document approves. All documents must approve before a red flag report generates. The workflow gates the output.
The output of a GenAIM matter is your firm's red flag report template, populated with the AI analysis in the right places. No cutting and pasting from Word documents or spreadsheets into the report. The draft executive summary and recommendations are flagged for partner review. The findings themselves, risk-rated, clause-referenced, and action-tracked, have been verified through the workflow.
This report sets out red flag findings from review of the data room for Project Marlow against the firm's standard buy-side checklists, with sector-specific overlays applied. Material findings are concentrated in Material Contracts: change-of-control termination rights in two key supplier agreements, unequal assignment restrictions, and a $100,000 penalty clause for late notification. Cross-document analysis identified one referenced contract missing from the data room.
| Category | Docs | Risk | Lead Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Contracts | 14 | Red | Change of control triggers termination in 2 contracts |
| Intellectual Property | 6 | Amber | Contractor IP assignment unexecuted |
| Employees | 9 | Amber | Non-compete missing for 2 key employees |
| Real Property | 4 | Green | Leases current, no change-of-control triggers |
| Customer Contracts | 8 | Green | Standard terms, no material change-of-control triggers |
| Regulatory & Compliance | 5 | Green | Material licences current, no breaches identified |
| Licences & Permits | 2 | Green | All current, no transfer restrictions |
| Litigation | — | Not reviewed | Out of scope, ref. engagement letter §2 |
Issue. Change-of-control clause in cl. 20 of the Master Service Agreement allows the counterparty to terminate within 60 days of an ownership change. Cl. 20.3 imposes a $100,000 penalty for failure to provide 30 days' advance notice. The acquisition will trigger this right automatically.
The interface behind the report.
12.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either Party with ninety (90) days' written notice, except as otherwise provided in this clause 12.
12.2 The Vendor may terminate this Agreement with immediate effect upon any of the following events of default:
(a) a Change of Control of Harbour, including but not limited to:
(i) the sale of more than fifty percent (50%) of the equity interests in Harbour;
(ii) the merger or consolidation of Harbour with any third party;
…
(vi) the acquisition of Harbour by any entity not affiliated with the original ownership at the Effective Date;
12.2(b) Upon a Change of Control event, the Vendor's right to terminate is automatic and effective immediately upon notice.
12.2(c) Harbour shall be liable for a penalty of $100,000 in the event of failure to provide thirty (30) days' advance notice of any Change of Control event.
Clause 12.2(a)(vi) treats a change of control of Harbour as an event of default, allowing the Vendor to terminate the agreement immediately. The buyer's acquisition of Harbour triggers this termination right.
Negotiate with the Vendor before acquisition to obtain written consent to the change of control, or an amendment removing Harbour from the termination provisions in Clause 12.2(a)(vi).
Your DD methodology is your firm's IP. It's how partners differentiate the work, how clients return for the next deal, how associates train into seniors. GenAIM doesn't replace it. GenAIM runs it.
Your firm's checklists, risk categories, and standards. Different checklists for different document types, applied automatically.
Maps document families automatically: head agreements through to SOWs and amendments. Flags conflicts between parent and child agreements, and detects documents referenced but missing from the data room.
Add steps, remove steps, or build entirely new workflows without rebuilding the system. Workflow and agent builders let your team compose the pipeline, not ours.
We work with M&A teams who want to shape how agentic judgment fits their methodology. The engagement is structured, time-boxed, and built around a real workflow.
Built against real transactions. Thousands of edge cases.
A 30-minute working session. Bring your workflow and methodology; we'll show how GenAIM would run it end to end. By the end of the call you'll know whether a 4-6 week engagement is the right next step.